|
Mary
Hutchinson (1810-1880), 'factory' matron, was born on 23 October
l810 at Parramatta, New South Wales, third daughter and one of fourteen
children of Rebecca (born Small) and Francis Oakes, missionaries.
Her childhood was spent in Parramatta in close proximity to the
old 'female factory' where her father was superintendent (1814-22).
Mary attended James Bradley's seminary. On 2 May 1826 she married
John Hutchinson, Wesleyan minister and missionary. They went to
Tonga to start a Christian mission but were eventually driven to
retreat.
From Windsor, New South Wales (1828-30), they went to Hobart, where
in 1832 John Hutchinson was appointed superintendent, and Mrs Hutchinson
matron, of the Female House of Correction, commonly referred to
as the female factory, and situated at Cascades. Her first child,
born on Tonga, died while they were at Windsor. More children followed,
twelve in all, of whom six died in infancy.
As matron Mrs Hutchinson had special responsibility for the health
and behaviour of inmates. The original building was a distillery,
purchased in 1827 and hastily converted to accommodate women prisoners
when the numbers transported rose in the late 1820s. Despite alterations
and extensions it was never suitable accommodation for the overlapping
purposes of an institution which was gaol, workshop, hospital, nursery
and (in theory) a reformatory.
The matron's problems were compounded by the further increase in
the numbers transported, both in the 1830s and more markedly in
the 1840s after transportation to New South Wales had ended, and
by changing emphases in British penal policy. Assignment on arrival
was replaced (in theory) by supervised labour, then restored, and
later a worktask system operated. Very little could be manufactured
which was commercially competitive when outside factories operated
with steam- powered machinery. The women did laundry and needlework.
Many were idle for long periods and a 'flash mob' caused trouble.
The more enduring problem was the health of inmates. A diet which
was barely adequate for healthy adults (though supplemented for
pregnant women) probably left inmates irritable and susceptible
to respiratory diseases. Mortality was high and especially among
infants who were routinely separated from their mothers on being
weaned.
Her husband's recurring illnesses left Mrs Hutchinson in control
of an institution which by 1850 housed over 1000 women; her discipline
was effective and commented upon. Lieut Colonel G.C.Mundy who inspected
the factory in 1851 wrote: 'The cleanliness of the prison was almost
dazzling, and the order and discipline appeared faultless'. 'Dead
silence' everywhere was observed.
Periodically however Mrs Hutchinson was subjected to a barrage of
press criticism. Some of it, notably a spate of unfavourable reports
in 1838 when the continuation of transportation was in question,
was due as much to a wish to be rid of the taint of convictism as
to any particular defect in her administration. Criticism arose
also from the expectation that properly organised punishment should
bring about the reformation of prisoners. Mrs Hutchinson believed
behaviour could be improved by housing women in small groups, but
that was never a possibility. Conditions slowly improved. The old
barracks were used to house new arrivals, new quarters were provided
for women with children, looms were installed and a points system
introduced.
When ill health forced John Hutchinson's retirement in 1851, his
wife's continued employment 'as a subordinate in the Establishment
of which she had been virtually the Superintendent' was considered
undesirable; as a woman she was not thought suitable to be Superintendent.
She was permitted appointment as matron-in-charge of the smaller
Launceston 'factory' where she remained until 31 August 1854 when
she retired on a pension of 60 pounds. She died in Hobart on 19
February 1880. Few of her many critics and fewer still of those
who perpetuated the myth of factory debauchery, ever visited Mrs
Hutchinson's 'factory'.
Heather Radi
R.C.Hutchinson, 'Mrs Hutchinson and the Female Factories of Early
Australia' Tasmanian Historical Research Association Papers and
Proceedings Dec 1963 pp 50-67.
|